RDI
Menu

29 · Progress Tracking & Documentation

Multi-Site / Portfolio-Level Remote Oversight

CommonMedium confidenceReplacement role15 evidence

Description

the evidence system multi-project dashboard and shared access model enable senior managers/directors/executives to monitor multiple sites simultaneously from a single platform interface.

Trigger

Senior manager/director with multi-project oversight responsibility needs current status check — scheduled daily/weekly review, response to escalated concern, or portfolio board meeting preparation.

Activity

Accessing the evidence system multi-project dashboard to review live feeds, recent time-lapses, and recorded footage across multiple sites.

Conclusion

Portfolio-level review completed. Sites performing to programme confirmed; sites with identified concerns flagged to site team.

Role detail

the evidence system multi-project dashboard and shared access model enable senior managers/directors/executives to monitor multiple sites simultaneously from a single platform interface.

Steps (8)

  1. 1Scheduled portfolio review trigger occurs or specific site concern escalated.
  2. 2Senior manager/director logs into the evidence system platform accessing multi-project dashboard.
  3. 3Live camera feeds reviewed for each site in sequence.
  4. 4Compare tool used for detailed progress assessment — before/after snapshots.
  5. 5Time-lapse videos reviewed for sites with specific milestones requiring assessment.
  6. 6Where issue identified, director raises with site PM referencing footage timestamp.
  7. 7For portfolio board meetings, multi-site footage compiled into portfolio progress report.
  8. 8Access permissions managed at organisation level — new projects added, completed archived.

Evidence (3)

  • Senior director describes using the evidence system to monitor all active projects from a single login — conducting a daily portfolio review of live feeds across multiple sites before the working day begins, enabling rapid identification of sites requiring attention without physical travel.

    Anonymized evidence record 29.1

  • Multi-site contractor describes the value of the evidence system's shared access model for portfolio management — project directors, regional managers, and the CEO all have access to live feeds across all active projects, enabling executive oversight without requiring site visits or waiting for filtered reports from site teams.

    Anonymized evidence record 29.2

  • He already uses time-lapse videos weekly to send to his owners (P&G) to meet their progress update needs.

    Anonymized evidence record 29.3

ROI model — Template A

Evercam replaces or reduces physical site visits with remote viewing. The baseline cost is the number of visits × cost per visit. The saving is the proportion of visits that Evercam eliminates.

saving = visits_per_week × project_duration_weeks × visit_cost × evercam_reduction_pct

Notes

Qualitatively different from single-project monitoring — breadth vs. depth value proposition. Product gap: no aggregate status indicators across sites. Commercial: significant capability multiplier for main contractors with 10-50 concurrent projects.

Tags

progress-trackingremote-collaboration